Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 257: 11-18, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33310656

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the proportions of asymptomatic, mild and severe diseases in infected pregnant women admitted for delivery. To compare maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women with those of non-infected patients. STUDY DESIGN: Through an universal PCR testing for SARS-COV-2 at admission (not symptoms-based), this prospective cohort study enrolled all pregnant women admitted for delivery between 16th of June and the 16th of August 2020 in the West French Guiana Hospital Center. RESULTS: 507 pregnant women were included during the study period, of which 137 (27 %) were infected with SARS-COV-2. On admission, only 34/137 (24.8 %) of these patients presented with clinical symptoms. Among asymptomatic women, 16 /103 (15 %) became symptomatic after diagnosis. Throughout the delivery hospitalization and follow-up, 87/137 (63.5 %) remained always asymptomatic, 45/137 (32.8 %) developed a mild COVID-19 and 5/137 (3.6 %) developed a severe infection. SARS-CoV-2 infected patients were more likely to have post-partum hemorrhage >500 mL (14.2 % vs 7.2 %, RR 2.0 [95 %CI 1.1-3.4]), to be transfused (5.5 % vs 1.1 %, RR 4.9 [1.5-16.6]), and to be hospitalized in ICU (3.6 % vs 0.8 %, RR 4.5 [95 %CI 1.1-18.6] than uninfected ones. Intra-uterine fetal demises were more common in infected mothers compared to controls (5.1 % vs 1.1 %, RR 4.7 [95 % CI 1.4-45.9). Among 108 neonates from infected mothers tested at birth, none tested positive (0/108). When tested between 25 and 42 h after delivery, 4/29 (13.7 %) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs and remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women admitted for delivery and diagnosed with a SARS-COV-2 infection through an universal screening were symptomatic in only a quarter of cases. Their risks of post-partum hemorrhage, transfusion and admission to ICU were higher than those of uninfected patients. They also presented a higher risk of intra-uterine fetal demise. There were no other differences in maternal, obstetrical or neonatal outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Asintomáticas , Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/transmisión , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Guyana Francesa/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Mortinato/epidemiología
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 248: 58-62, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32179287

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral mifepristone use for cervical ripening and the initiation of labor in women with normal pregnancies at or beyond term. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a monocentric, prospective, comparative study on the induction of labor in women with an unfavorable cervix after 37 or more weeks of gestation in the Franck Joly Hospital, French Guiana. The immediate induction of labor by mifepristone was compared to expectant management and the induction of labor with routine cervical ripening agents during two consecutive periods. During the first period, patients received mifepristone (600 mg orally at the moment of enrollment) and were evaluated after 48 h. In the second period, patients did not receive any drugs and were evaluated after 48 h of expectant management. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Spontaneous labor or a Bishop Score ≥6 within 48 h of mifepristone administration. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: enrollment-induction to delivery interval, rate of failed induction, doses of prostaglandin used, mode of delivery, requirement of oxytocin augmentation, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: This study enrolled 231 women, 108 in the first and 123 in the second period undergoing induced labor at term caused by various obstetric conditions. There were no significant differences between groups for age, body mass index, gravida, parity, the initial Bishop Score, scarred uterus, or post-term pregnancy. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups concerning spontaneous labor and/ or a Bishop Score ≥6 within 48 h (p < 10-3) and received doses of misoprostol (p = 0.01). Patients receiving mifepristone were 10 times more likely to be in labor after 48 h of inclusion (RR = 9.98, CI 95 % = [4.47-22.29]). The enrollment-induction to delivery interval was significantly shorter for the mifepristone group (p < 0.001). There were no other differences in mode of delivery, placenta abnormalities or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone efficiently induced cervical ripening and labor initiation in women with normal pregnancies at or beyond term. It may offer an alternative method to the classic induction especially for patients seeking spontaneous labor.


Asunto(s)
Maduración Cervical/efectos de los fármacos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Misoprostol/administración & dosificación , Oxitócicos/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Embarazo Prolongado , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...